Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
No Chemotherapy-vs-On Chemotherapy	9.63209235680445E-104

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
No endocrine treatment-vs-Endocrine treatment	5.10875078630465E-58

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
ER negative-vs-ER postive	2.39247842665954E-73

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
HER2 negative-vs-HER2 positive	3.47192870876306E-41

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
ki67 negative-vs-ki67 positive	2.07035475769014E-63

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
PR negative-vs-PR positive	3.5742848149217E-55

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
Lymph node negative-vs-Lymph node positive	1.05721835757928E-06

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2.

Comparison	Statistical significance
Patient alive-vs-Patient dead	4.2837948606318E-08

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2

Show statistics

Hide statistics Comparison Statistical significance Grade1-vs-Grade2 5.24994475917433E-11 Grade1-vs-Grade3 6.24895235067698E-172 Grade2-vs-Grade3 7.76327687266301E-152

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2

Show statistics

Hide statistics Comparison Statistical significance Age-20-40yrs-vs-Age-41-60yrs <1E-12 Age-20-40yrs-vs-Age-61-80yrs <1E-12 Age-20-40yrs-vs-Age-81-100yrs <1E-12 Age-41-60yrs-vs-Age-61-80yrs <1E-12 Age-41-60yrs-vs-Age-81-100yrs <1E-12 Age-61-80yrs-vs-Age-81-100yrs <1E-12

Brueffer C et al. Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative. JCO Precis Oncol 2018;2

Show statistics

Hide statistics Comparison Statistical significance Normal like-vs-Luminal A 2.93578717528712E-09 Normal like-vs-Luminal B 1.189912E-01 Normal like-vs-HER2 enriched 2.87716234377001E-53 Normal like-vs-Basal like 3.88874756875674E-70 Luminal A-vs-Luminal B 3.77957382963565E-22 Luminal A-vs-HER2 enriched 1.83428354793271E-100 Luminal A-vs-Basal like 1.54380263131002E-127 Luminal B-vs-HER2 enriched 1.11395552187285E-58 Luminal B-vs-Basal like 1.94599394969756E-83 HER2 enriched-vs-Basal like 2.288537E-03